40.8 F
Citrus Heights
Monday, March 27, 2023

Related stories

Citrus Heights News Briefs: schools, Sayonara, business, shoplifting

Latest local news briefs include outcomes on four significant or controversial votes held by the Citrus Heights City Council on March 23. Votes related to housing on Sayonara Drive, $1 million in business attraction funding, support for SB 316, and a vote to form an education advisory committee.

A closer look at potential mixed-use development on Auburn Blvd

By Phillip Pesola-- New design standards for residential and mixed-use development along Auburn Boulevard were presented to and unanimously supported by Citrus Heights Planning Commissioners during their meeting on Wednesday.

130-unit senior apartment complex in Citrus Heights now slated for auction

By Mike Hazlip— A large, senior apartment complex on Sunrise Boulevard that was the subject of several closed-door meetings with city leaders last year is now slated to be sold at auction on April 17...

Citrus Heights projected to have $8M surplus this year

By Phillip Pesola-- The days of budget cuts appear to be over in Citrus Heights, as the City Council earlier this month received a report showing a projected $8 million surplus this year...

The Civic Minute: What’s happening at Citrus Heights City Hall?

The Citrus Heights City Council will meet this Thursday to consider approving an agreement that would put more than two dozen new housing units on Sayonara Drive, as well as...

Citrus Heights council restores two-vote policy to place items on agenda


Sentinel staff report–
As an indication of a change in leadership in the city, Citrus Heights council members earlier this month voted to reverse a controversial change made two years ago when the council had voted to require majority support in order to place an item on the council’s agenda.

Up until 2020, the City Council required the support of just two out of five council members to place an item on an upcoming agenda for a vote or discussion. In 2020, the council voted in a narrow decision to increase that requirement to three members.

At the time, Councilman Bret Daniels called the move by his colleagues “Bulls__” and said it was targeted at trying to silence him, in the event that Tim Schaefer would be elected to the City Council that year.

Schaefer was subsequently elected, but remained a minority voice on the board in several split votes.

Now, with a new makeup on the City Council in 2023, Schaefer and Daniels are serving terms as mayor and vice mayor. Two new council members were also elected last year to replace two members who retired.

Related: Citrus Heights has a new mayor and vice mayor. Is change coming?

Daniels proposed returning to the two-vote rule during the same meeting when the council’s two new members were sworn in last month. In an email to The Sentinel, Daniels said the three-vote requirement was “ridiculous, because it allowed a council majority to squash efforts by other councilmembers without even having them heard and voted on.”

In a unanimous vote on Jan. 12, the council opted to return to the two-vote requirement. “There will now be greater opportunity for The People to be heard,” Daniels told The Sentinel.

Agenda items will still require a majority vote to pass, but a council member who wants to put an item on the agenda will only need support from one other member for it to appear on a future agenda.

Porsche Middleton, who supported the shift to a three-vote requirement in 2020, also supported returning to the two-vote rule.

“Requiring three votes during an unprecedented time forced our council to be laser-focused on the solutions that would have an immediate and direct impact on rebuilding our economy, supporting our local business owners, and helping the residents of our city,” Middleton said in a Facebook post following her vote this month.

“We no longer need three votes because we have moved out of the uncertainty of the pandemic,” the councilwoman said. “Three votes was the right decision in 2020, and two votes is the right decision now.”

Middleton previously did not cite the pandemic as her reason for supporting the change to a three-vote requirement in 2020.

“Having a majority to add items to future agendas will insure (sp) that no two  councilmembers can push their own personal agenda,” Middleton said two years ago. “It is a safe guard to make sure everything that is being brought forward is in the best interest for all residents regardless of what district they live in or who their Council Member is.”

Want to share your thoughts about the City Council? Submit a letter to the editor online by clicking here.

Like local news? Sign up for The Sentinel’s free Weekend Edition to get one email each Sunday with all local news and no spam, ever. (Click here)